German Da-Compounds: darauf, damit, dafür, davon Explained
By Michael McGettrickUpdated 27 September 2026
Ask an English speaker to translate I'm waiting for it into German word by word, and most will reach for a preposition plus . German does not build the sentence that way at all. It fuses the preposition onto a small pointing word, , and the result, , does the whole job of for it in one piece.
These are the -compounds, and once you know the pattern for one you know it for roughly a dozen, because German builds every single one the same way: (r) plus the preposition, no gaps, no exceptions in the shape itself. This structure is on the AQA GCSE German (8662) specification at Foundation and Higher tier.
The pattern: da (or dar) plus a preposition
Fuse onto a preposition and you get a word that stands in for "preposition plus a pronoun referring to a thing":
| preposition | da-compound | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| | with it, by means of that |
| | for it |
| | of it, from it |
| | against it |
| | after that |
| | with it, in doing so |
Before a preposition starting with a vowel, an extra r slots in to keep the vowels apart, giving dar- instead of plain -:
| preposition | da-compound | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| | on it, about that |
an | | on/at it, about it |
in | | in it |
| | about it, over it |
| | under it, among them |
The r has no meaning of its own; it is purely there so that plus does not collide into an awkward run of vowels. Learn the rule (vowel-starting preposition needs r, consonant-starting one does not) once, and you can build any da-compound on the spot rather than memorising a dozen separate words.
What it replaces: preposition plus a pronoun, for a thing
The whole reason da-compounds exist is that German cannot naturally combine most prepositions with the way it combines them with a personal pronoun for a person. Compare:
an .->an .- I am thinking of my brother. -> I am thinking of him.an Problem.->.- I am thinking of the problem. -> I am thinking of it.
The first pair keeps the ordinary preposition and simply swaps in a personal pronoun, exactly as English does. The second pair cannot do that; an is not how German expresses this, so the whole phrase collapses into one word, , instead.
Some more everyday examples:
Bus.->.- I am waiting for the bus. -> I am waiting for it.an .->.- She is working on her project. -> She is working on it.Er .->Er .- He talks about his trip. -> He talks about it.
Never for people
This is the rule that trips learners up most, because it runs against the instinct that a pronoun should always be able to replace a noun. Da-compounds only ever stand in for a thing, an idea, or a whole clause. The moment the noun is a person, German goes back to the ordinary preposition plus personal pronoun:
an Problem.->.(a thing: da-compound)an .->an .(a person: preposition + pronoun, never daran)
Say about a person and a German listener will assume you mean some plan or fact connected to them, not the person themselves. The distinction, thing versus person, is the whole rule in everyday use. The one fixed exception is meaning "among them" in a list, which can include people: , (Many guests came, among them two teachers).
Introducing a clause
Da-compounds also do a second job: they can open a sentence and then explain themselves with a following clause, much as English uses it before spelling out what "it" means:
, .- I am looking forward to seeing you soon.Er , er .- He is thinking over whether to sell the car.
Here and do not point back to something already mentioned; they point forward, flagging that a clause is coming which will fill in the detail. This use is extremely common with verbs that are naturally paired with a preposition, such as (to look forward to) and (to think over, to ponder).
Verbs that come glued to a preposition
Many German verbs are learned as a pair with their preposition, the same way English pairs wait for or think about, and those pairs are exactly where da-compounds show up most:
(to wait for) ->(to look forward to) ->an(to think of) ->/(to talk about) ->/(to be interested in) ->
Learning the verb-preposition pair as a single unit, as German prepositions recommends generally, sets you up to build the matching da-compound automatically the moment the object is a thing rather than a person. Seeing a full pair in context makes the substitution clearer still:
.->.- I am interested in music. -> I am interested in it..->.- We are talking about the weather. -> We are talking about it.
Notice that the case the preposition normally governs plays no part in choosing the da-compound; always gives and always gives , whatever case each preposition happens to demand of an ordinary noun.
Referring back to a whole idea, not just one noun
A da-compound does not have to point at a single noun mentioned earlier. Just as often, it sums up an entire previous sentence or situation:
Er spät. .- He is late again. I don't mind. (literally: I have nothing against it, meaning the whole situation of him being late)hat die . .- She passed the exam. I am very pleased about it.
In both cases, and are not standing in for one specific noun from the previous sentence; they are standing in for the whole fact just stated. This is the same mechanism as introducing a following clause (, ), just running backwards: the compound gathers up everything already said instead of pointing forward to what is coming.
The question-word counterpart: wo(r)-compounds
Da-compounds have a matching set of question words, built the same way but with or wor instead of or dar: (with what), (on what, for what), (what for), (from what). They ask about the thing that a da-compound later refers back to:
?- What are you waiting for? -Bus. .- For the bus. I have been waiting for it for ages.?- What are you writing with? -Bleistift. am .- With a pencil. That is what I like writing with best.
German question words covers these in full; the point worth holding onto here is that da-compounds and wo-compounds are two views of the same underlying pattern, one answering, one asking, both replacing "preposition plus a thing" rather than "preposition plus a person". Learning them as a pair, question then answer, is often the quickest way to make both stick.
Mistakes English speakers make
Trying , , or any preposition plus . This is the literal word-for-word translation of on it, with it, and it is not how German expresses the idea. The da-compound is not an optional stylistic variant; it is the only normal way to say it.
Using a -compound for a person. daran referring to your sister, rather than to a fact or plan, sends the wrong meaning. If the noun being replaced is a person, switch back to preposition plus personal pronoun: an , .
Forgetting the extra r before a vowel-starting preposition. daauf and daan are not real words; the pattern needs dar- in front of , an, in, and the other vowel-starting prepositions.
Splitting the compound in two. Da and the preposition are written and said as one word, , never da auf as two.
Using a -compound to ask about a person. ? asks about a thing. To ask about a person, German keeps the preposition and uses or : ? (Who are you waiting for?), ? (Who are you talking to?).
What to do next
Learn , , and first, since they attach to some of the commonest verb-preposition pairs ( , , ) and will do the most work for you early on. Practise the person-versus-thing test on real sentences: whenever you are about to translate it after a preposition, check whether German would even allow a pronoun there, and reach for the da-compound if it would not. The German course introduces da-compounds alongside the prepositions and verbs they attach to, so you meet the pattern already doing a job rather than as an abstract rule to memorise on its own.