Latin grammar Part of Chapter 8

CEFR B1-B2

4 min read

Test yourself (16 questions)

Latin Participles: amans, amatus, amaturus

By Michael McGettrickUpdated 12 October 2026

A participle is a verb dressed as an adjective. Like a verb it has a tense and a voice; like an adjective it agrees with a noun. Latin has three, and a gap where English keeps its favourite.

the participle endingWhat do the colours mean?
ParticipleLatinEnglish
present activecalling
perfect passivehaving been called
future activeabout to call

Quick check

Now use it: three quick questions on the chart above. The full practice is further down.

Pick the right one

0/3

Unfold the participle. Which English word fits best?

  1. Milites victi fugerunt. The soldiers fled they had been beaten.

  2. Hostes victi tamen non fugerunt. they had been beaten, the enemy did not flee.

  3. Verba a rege dicta omnes audiverunt. Everyone heard the words the king spoke.

Missing: being called and, above all, having called.

The three participles

Present active: -ns, -ntis

Add -ns to the present stem; the genitive is -ntis. The third and fourth conjugations put an -e- in front:

VerbParticipleGenitive

It declines like the adjective , : accusative , plural .

The ablative is usually -e ( , by the king as he calls), but -i when the participle has become a plain adjective.

  • Danaos . - I fear the Greeks, even when they bring gifts. (Virgil, Aeneid 2.49)

Perfect passive: the fourth principal part

The dictionary's fourth form, declined like , , :

captum, the fourth principal part, gives captus, having been taken
  • . - We saw the captured city.
  • . - We heard the words (that had been) spoken.

Future active: -urus

The same stem plus -urus, also like :

VerbParticipleEnglish
about to come
about to say
about to be
about to die

gave English future. And gave the line Suetonius reports from the fighters at a show for the emperor Claudius:

  • salutant - those about to you (Suetonius, Claudius 21.6, after a greeting to the emperor)

The gap: no "having done"

passive: having been doneactive: having doneWhat do the colours mean?

Latin has no perfect active participle for ordinary verbs. English uses one all the time (having seen the city, he turned back); Latin cannot.

LatinMeansNever
the king, having been capturedhaving captured
the boy, having been seenhaving seen

If the noun looks like the doer rather than the victim, you have misread something. Latin says having seen the city with a clause, with two verbs joined by , or with the ablative absolute (below).

Deponents fill the gap

A deponent's perfect participle is active, so these are the only ones that can say having done:

VerbParticipleEnglish
having spoken
having followed
having set out
having gone in
having suffered
having used
  • , , . - Having said this, the king went away.

A handful of ordinary verbs have active ones too, such as cenatus, having dined, and , having sworn. They are exceptions you will recognise when you meet them.

Unfold it into a clause

A participle is a clause folded into one word. Word for word, is the soldiers, having been beaten, fled: clear, and bad English. Unfold it:

  • . - The soldiers fled because they had been beaten.

The participle carries no conjunction, so you choose one:

RelationshipLatinEnglish
time .When he saw the city, the king gave the signal.
cause .The soldiers fled because they were beaten.
concession .Although beaten, the enemy did not flee.
description .We heard the words which the king spoke.

The words around it help. A (however) in the main clause usually means although. A participle right beside its noun, with nothing between them, is usually just describing it: currens, running water.

Tense is relative to the main verb

same timeearlierlaterWhat do the colours mean?

A participle's tense is measured from the main verb, not from now, just like the infinitives in indirect statement:

  • victi: beaten before they fled

  • videns: seeing as he gave the signal

  • morituri: about to die after they greet him

Timeline from earlier to later, with the main verb marked.

TimeLatinEnglish
same time .The king spoke as he was dying.
earlier .The soldiers fled after they were beaten.
later salutant.The soldiers who are about to die greet the king.

So a present participle beside a past main verb turns into an English past: in is seeing in form and when he saw in sense.

Participles as nouns

Drop the noun, and the participle becomes one, like any Latin adjective:

LatinEnglish
the dead
sayings, things said
things done, achievements

is the title of the account Augustus wrote of his own achievements.

One step further: the ablative absolute

When a noun and its participle have no job in the rest of the sentence, Latin puts both into the ablative and sets them apart:

  • , . - When the city had been captured, the soldiers went back.

That is the ablative absolute, Latin's main way round the missing having done. It has its own lesson.

Mistakes English speakers make

WrongRightWhy
: having takenhaving been takenan ordinary verb's participle is passive
ducans3rd and 4th conjugations: -ens
it agrees with its noun
= is dyingwas dying (after )present participle: same time as

What to do next

  1. Learn the three on one verb: , , .
  2. Every time you meet a participle, choose the English conjunction before you translate.
  3. Then read the ablative absolute.

Practise: test yourself

Build the word

0/4

Build the participle in the nominative masculine singular.

  1. calling (voco)

    Accents optional

    Your word is empty.

  2. leading (duco)

    Accents optional

    Your word is empty.

  3. about to come (venio)

    Accents optional

    Your word is empty.

  4. having been taken (capio)

    Accents optional

    Your word is empty.

Sort into groups

0/6

Is the participle earlier than the main verb, at the same time, or later?

Tap a word, then the group it belongs in.

Pick the right one

0/3

Unfold the participle. Which English word fits best?

  1. Milites victi fugerunt. The soldiers fled they had been beaten.

  2. Hostes victi tamen non fugerunt. they had been beaten, the enemy did not flee.

  3. Verba a rege dicta omnes audiverunt. Everyone heard the words the king spoke.

Spot the mistake

0/3

A participle agrees with its noun. Tap the one that does not.

Chapters 1 and 2 free

This article is one lesson in a whole course

Every grammar point has its own article and drill, and the course wraps them in graded stories, games and printable worksheets, in the order you need them.

Chapters 1 and 2 free, forever. Plus: 7 days free, then $5 a month for all eleven languages.

Start learning free

Latin · Free printables

Practice worksheets and infographics

Practice worksheets with answer keys built in, plus infographic and listicle formats. Open any one to view, print or save.

Free for members

The printable worksheets, infographics and PDFs are free with an account. Start a free week and download as many as you like.

Start your free week

Frequently asked questions

How many participles does Latin have?
Three in everyday use: the present active (, loving), the perfect passive (, having been loved) and the future active (, about to love). The gerundive , needing to be loved, is sometimes counted as a fourth, but it does its own job and is taught separately. Latin has no present passive participle (being loved) and no perfect active one (having loved) for ordinary verbs.
Why is there no perfect active participle in Latin?
The language simply never had one for ordinary verbs. Where English says having seen the city, Latin uses a clause, two verbs joined by , or the ablative absolute. verbs are the exception: their perfect participles are active, so is having spoken and is having set out, and Latin writers lean on them for exactly that reason.
Is the Latin perfect participle always passive?
For ordinary verbs, yes. is the king having been captured, never the king having captured. The active ones belong to verbs (, , ), to a few semi-deponents (, having dared) and to a short list of oddities such as cenatus, having dined, and , having sworn.
How do you translate a Latin participle into English?
Unfold it into a clause. is literally the soldiers, having been beaten, fled, and it means the soldiers fled because they had been beaten. The same participle can unfold into when, because, although, after or who. Latin does not say which, so choose the one the sentence needs.
What is the difference between , and ?
Voice and time compared with the main verb. is active and at the same time: loving. is passive and earlier: having been loved. is active and later: about to love. So is the king said as he was dying, and is the soldiers fled because they had been beaten.