Latin Participles: amans, amatus, amaturus
By Michael McGettrickUpdated 12 October 2026
A participle is a verb dressed as an adjective. Like a verb it has a tense and a voice; like an adjective it agrees with a noun. Latin has three, and a gap where English keeps its favourite.
| Participle | Latin | English |
|---|---|---|
| present active | | calling |
| perfect passive | | having been called |
| future active | | about to call |
Quick check
Now use it: three quick questions on the chart above. The full practice is further down.
Pick the right one
0/3Unfold the participle. Which English word fits best?
Milites victi fugerunt. The soldiers fled they had been beaten.
Hostes victi tamen non fugerunt. they had been beaten, the enemy did not flee.
Verba a rege dicta omnes audiverunt. Everyone heard the words the king spoke.
Missing: being called and, above all, having called.
The three participles
Present active: -ns, -ntis
Add -ns to the present stem; the genitive is -ntis. The third and fourth conjugations put an -e- in front:
| Verb | Participle | Genitive |
|---|---|---|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
It declines like the adjective , : accusative , plural .
The ablative is usually -e ( , by the king as he calls), but -i when the participle has become a plain adjective.
Danaos .- I fear the Greeks, even when they bring gifts. (Virgil, Aeneid 2.49)
Perfect passive: the fourth principal part
The dictionary's fourth form, declined like , , :
.- We saw the captured city..- We heard the words (that had been) spoken.
Future active: -urus
The same stem plus -urus, also like :
| Verb | Participle | English |
|---|---|---|
| | about to come |
| | about to say |
| | about to be |
| | about to die |
gave English future. And gave the line Suetonius reports from the fighters at a show for the emperor Claudius:
salutant- those about toyou (Suetonius, Claudius 21.6, after a greeting to the emperor)
The gap: no "having done"
Latin has no perfect active participle for ordinary verbs. English uses one all the time (having seen the city, he turned back); Latin cannot.
| Latin | Means | Never |
|---|---|---|
| the king, having been captured | having captured |
| the boy, having been seen | having seen |
If the noun looks like the doer rather than the victim, you have misread something. Latin says having seen the city with a clause, with two verbs joined by , or with the ablative absolute (below).
Deponents fill the gap
A deponent's perfect participle is active, so these are the only ones that can say having done:
| Verb | Participle | English |
|---|---|---|
| | having spoken |
| | having followed |
| | having set out |
| | having gone in |
| | having suffered |
| | having used |
, , .- Having said this, the king went away.
A handful of ordinary verbs have active ones too, such as cenatus, having dined, and , having sworn. They are exceptions you will recognise when you meet them.
Unfold it into a clause
A participle is a clause folded into one word. Word for word, is the soldiers, having been beaten, fled: clear, and bad English. Unfold it:
.- The soldiers fled because they had been beaten.
The participle carries no conjunction, so you choose one:
| Relationship | Latin | English |
|---|---|---|
| time | . | When he saw the city, the king gave the signal. |
| cause | . | The soldiers fled because they were beaten. |
| concession | . | Although beaten, the enemy did not flee. |
| description | . | We heard the words which the king spoke. |
The words around it help. A (however) in the main clause usually means although. A participle right beside its noun, with nothing between them, is usually just describing it: currens, running water.
Tense is relative to the main verb
A participle's tense is measured from the main verb, not from now, just like the infinitives in indirect statement:
victi: beaten before they fled
videns: seeing as he gave the signal
morituri: about to die after they greet him
Timeline from earlier to later, with the main verb marked.
| Time | Latin | English |
|---|---|---|
| same time | . | The king spoke as he was dying. |
| earlier | . | The soldiers fled after they were beaten. |
| later | salutant. | The soldiers who are about to die greet the king. |
So a present participle beside a past main verb turns into an English past: in is seeing in form and when he saw in sense.
Participles as nouns
Drop the noun, and the participle becomes one, like any Latin adjective:
| Latin | English |
|---|---|
| the dead |
| sayings, things said |
| things done, achievements |
is the title of the account Augustus wrote of his own achievements.
One step further: the ablative absolute
When a noun and its participle have no job in the rest of the sentence, Latin puts both into the ablative and sets them apart:
, .- When the city had been captured, the soldiers went back.
That is the ablative absolute, Latin's main way round the missing having done. It has its own lesson.
Mistakes English speakers make
| Wrong | Right | Why |
|---|---|---|
: having taken | having been taken | an ordinary verb's participle is passive |
ducans | | 3rd and 4th conjugations: -ens |
| | it agrees with its noun |
= is dying | was dying (after ) | present participle: same time as |
What to do next
- Learn the three on one verb:
,,. - Every time you meet a participle, choose the English conjunction before you translate.
- Then read the ablative absolute.