Part of Chapter 2

CEFR A1-B1

8 min read

Test yourself (23 questions)

German Simple Past (Präteritum): war, hatte and the Written Past

By Michael McGettrickUpdated 2 October 2026

The German simple past, the Präteritum, is the past tense of the printed page: novels, news reports and fairy tales. In conversation Germans use the perfect tense instead, except for war, and the modal verbs. The AQA GCSE German specification includes the simple past of and .

Here is the whole system on one screen:

TypeInfinitiveich / erRule
/ , war, irregular, learn first
Modalstem + -te, no umlaut
Weakstem + -te
Strongnew vowel, no -te
Mixednew vowel + -te

War and hatte: the two you need first

and have their own simple past forms, and they are the most useful ones in the language. Notice that and er / / are the same word, with no ending at all.

(was) (had)
war
er / / war
/

Some everyday sentences:

  • war . - I was at home yesterday.
  • war gut. - That was good.
  • Er war . - He was not here.
  • . - We had no time.
  • . - She had two children.
  • ? - Were you afraid?

Speakers use these two even when everything else in the story is in the perfect. war is the natural way to say I was tired; the perfect version, , is correct and common in the far south and Austria, but sounds roundabout in most of Germany.

The modals are the third group that survives in everyday speech. They are regular in their pattern, stem plus -te, with one change: an umlaut in the infinitive disappears.

Infinitiveich / erMeaning
could, was able to
had to
wanted to
was supposed to
was allowed to
liked

also changes its consonant, g to ch. The other persons add the ordinary endings: , , . As in the present tense, the other verb goes to the end as an infinitive:

  • . - I had to work yesterday.
  • Er . - He could not sleep.
  • . - We wanted to go home.
  • . - I did not like him.

does two jobs. It means was supposed to, and the same form also means should. Context tells you which. See modal verbs for the present tense.

The reason the modals keep the short form is practical. The perfect of a modal with another verb needs a double infinitive crowded at the end of the clause, which is clumsy to say and easy to get wrong, so most speakers take the one-word past instead. is shorter, clearer and just as correct. Of everything on this page, these six forms repay the effort most, because you will say them every day.

Weak verbs: add -te

Most German verbs are weak, and the simple past is simple: take the stem and add -te, then the personal ending. The and er forms stop at -te.

er / /
/

A stem that ends in -t or -d needs an extra e so that the ending can be heard: , not arbeitte. The same happens with , . So does a stem ending in -m or -n after another consonant, unless that consonant is l or r: , , and likewise atmete and öffnete. Everything else just adds -te: , ; , ; , ; , .

A weak verb's simple past and its participle share one skeleton: goes with , with . That makes weak verbs the cheapest thing to learn in German. A new weak verb never needs looking up, because the pattern is always the same. New and borrowed verbs follow this pattern too, so it is the one to fall back on when you are unsure.

Strong verbs: a new vowel, no -te

Strong verbs change the stem vowel and add nothing in the and er forms. These are the old, common verbs, and the ones you will meet most in reading:

Infinitiveich / erMeaning
went
came
saw
gave
took
found
standstood
stayed
spoke
drove, went
wrote
read

The other persons take endings: , , . After -d or -t the and forms add an e: , . The vowel changes come in repeating families, laid out in the German irregular verbs guide, and that page is the place to learn them as patterns instead of as twelve separate facts.

Learn each strong verb as a trio: infinitive, simple past, participle. Not just , but , , . The vowel changes cannot be calculated from the infinitive, but each verb only needs learning once, and the English cognate is often a good clue: , against find, found; , against come, came.

Mixed verbs: wusste, dachte, brachte

A small group of common verbs does both things at once: the stem vowel changes, as in a strong verb, and the -te ending is added, as in a weak one. English has the same mix in bring, brought and think, thought.

Infinitiveich / erMeaning
knew (a fact)
thought
brought
knew (a person, a place)

They conjugate like weak verbs from there: , . Learn them as a short list; there is no rule that predicts them.

When German uses it: writing versus speaking

The simple past and the perfect mean almost the same thing. The difference is the setting.

SettingUsual choiceExample
Chatting about yesterdayPerfect .
News report, biographyPräteritum .
Novel, fairy talePräteritum war .
war, , modalsPräteritum .

German speakers tell a story in the simple past once they are reading it aloud or writing it down. When they talk, the perfect takes over for everything except those few verbs. The tendency is regional: in the south of Germany, in Austria and in Switzerland the spoken Präteritum is rarer still, while speakers in the north use it a little more. Even so, it is a tendency, not a rule, and you will hear both everywhere.

To see the difference, compare the same evening told twice. The first column is how you would say it to a friend. The second is how a narrator would write it.

Spoken (perfect)Written (Präteritum)
. .
. .
war . war .

The last row is the same in both columns, which is the point: war belongs to both registers. War and also help build the past perfect, for events earlier than another past event: . - I had already eaten.

For a learner this gives a practical split. Read and recognise the simple past everywhere; speak it for war, and the modals; use the perfect for the rest. Telling a past event in the present tense is a separate device, covered in the historical present.

One word-order difference helps reading. The simple past is a single word, so there is no participle waiting at the end of the clause: , war. A separable verb still splits, as in the present: Er .

Mistakes English speakers make

WrongRightWhy
Er gehteEr Strong verbs change vowel and take no -te.
Er Er The er form has no ending, like .
machete The extra e is only for stems like -, - and -.
arbeitte After -t the e is needed to hear the ending.
(for I could, was able to) The past modals lose the umlaut; means would be able to.
Er Er The separable prefix goes to the end.

The bigger mistake is not on the table: using the simple past for everything when talking. It is not ungrammatical, but can sound like a narrator, and a friend would say .

What to do next

  1. Learn war and until they are automatic, then add the six modals.
  2. Read a graded story and underline every simple past form you meet.
  3. Work through the irregular verbs pattern by pattern, then compare with the perfect tense.

Practise: test yourself

Pick the right one

0/5

war or hatte? Pick the verb that fits.

  1. Gestern ich sehr müde.

  2. Wir keine Zeit.

  3. Das ein guter Tag.

  4. Sie zwei Kinder.

  5. Er gestern krank.

Pick the right one

0/5

Pick the correct simple past form.

  1. Er gestern viel.

  2. Sie nach Hause.

  3. Ich die Antwort nicht.

  4. Wir lange zu Hause.

  5. Er mir das Buch.

Matching

0/6

Match the infinitive to its simple past form (ich / er).

Fill in the blank

0/4

Write the simple past form of the verb in brackets.

  1. Gestern wir Fußball. (spielen) (weak verb)

  2. Ich nicht schlafen. (können) (no umlaut)

  3. Er nach Berlin. (fahren) (strong verb)

  4. Er an seine Mutter. (denken) (mixed verb)

Translation drill

0/3

Read the German and give the English.

  1. Ich war gestern zu Hause.

  2. Sie kam spät nach Hause.

  3. Er konnte nicht schlafen.

German · Free printables

Practice worksheets and infographics

Practice worksheets with answer keys built in, plus infographic and listicle formats. Open any one to view, print or save.

Frequently asked questions

How do you form the simple past in German?
Weak verbs take the stem plus -te: machen becomes machte. Strong verbs change their stem vowel and add nothing: gehen becomes ging. Mixed verbs do both: denken becomes dachte. The other persons then take endings, such as -st for du and -en for wir.
Why is there no -t in ich war and er war?
In the simple past the ich and er / sie / es forms are always identical, and neither takes an ending. That is why ich war and er war match, and why ich ging and er ging do too. Only du, ihr and the plural forms add something.
When do you use the simple past instead of the perfect in German?
Use it in writing that tells a story: novels, fairy tales, news reports and biographies. In conversation the perfect is normal for most verbs. The exceptions are sein, haben and the modal verbs, which people use in the simple past even in speech.
Do Germans really use the Präteritum when speaking?
Mostly for a short list of verbs, above all war, hatte and the modals. Other verbs in the simple past can sound bookish in casual speech. The pull towards the perfect is strongest in the south, in Austria and in Switzerland, where even war often gives way to the perfect; northern speakers use a few more simple past forms. Understanding it matters more than producing it.
What is the difference between konnte and könnte?
Konnte is the simple past of können and means could, in the sense of was able to. Könnte is a different form with an umlaut, used for polite or hypothetical could. Keeping the umlaut in the simple past is a common mistake, because the past modals lose it.