Kilo Lingo
Part of Chapter 26

CEFR B2

7 min read

Test yourself (30 questions)

laisser, voir and entendre + Infinitive

The faire causatif page dealt with a verb that takes a bare infinitive and behaves like a grammatical operator. It is not alone. A handful of other verbs do the same, and they cluster around one idea: witnessing an action, or not preventing it.

  • , - see, watch
  • , - hear, listen to
  • - feel, smell
  • - let, allow

Every one of them takes an infinitive with no preposition. That much English speakers get right without thinking, because English agrees: "I saw him leave", not "I saw him to leave". The difficulty is in the wiring around it.

The bare infinitive, and why it is worth naming

The infinitive or subjunctive page sorted French triggers into three columns: bare infinitive, plus infinitive, à plus infinitive. These verbs sit firmly in the first column, alongside , , , , and .

  • . (I see him coming.)
  • l' . (I hear her singing.)
  • . (She is watching us play.)
  • . (I can feel the cold coming.)
  • - . (Let me go.)

Not je le vois de venir, not laisse-moi à partir. Nothing at all.

Two side notes while we are here. French has no separate present participle in this construction: "I hear her singing" is l' , with an infinitive, and je l'entends chantant is not French. And , and often correspond to English "can see, can hear, can feel" with no extra verb: l' is "I can hear her".

Where a noun object goes

With a noun rather than a pronoun, French allows the object on either side of the infinitive, and the preference depends on how heavy the sentence is.

  • On . / On . (You can hear the birds singing.)
  • J' . / J' . (I saw Marie leave.)

Both are correct. Where the infinitive has no object of its own, French tends to put the noun after it, which keeps the two verbs together: on is the more idiomatic of the pair.

Where the infinitive does have its own object, that freedom disappears, because two nouns after the infinitive would be unreadable. The witnessed person goes first:

  • J' . (I saw Marie close the door.)
  • Not j'ai vu fermer la porte Marie.

Where a pronoun goes: no choice at all

A pronoun object has one home, and it is in front of the conjugated verb.

  • . (I see him coming.) - never je vois le venir.
  • . (I can hear them singing.)
  • . (I heard them singing.) - compound tense, so in front of the auxiliary.
  • - . (Let him go.) - positive imperative, so the pronoun follows, as always.

This is the same rule as the causative, and for the same reason: the two verbs are read as a block.

The agreement test, and how it differs from faire

Now the interesting part, and the place where these verbs are not like . The participles , , , can agree with a preceding direct object. Whether they do depends on a single question:

Is the thing in front of the participle doing the infinitive's action, or having it done to it?

Doing it: agree.

  • . (I saw them leave.) - they left, so .
  • chanteuse j' . (The singer I heard sing.) - she sang, so .
  • l' . (I saw her fall.)

Having it done to it: no agreement.

  • j' . (The song I heard sung.) - the song did not sing, so , plain.
  • pièce j' . (The play I saw performed.)
  • ' a . (The trees he let be cut down.)

Compare with the causative, where the question never arises: plus an infinitive is invariable in every case, no test required. So j' has no e, while j' does.

A frank note on : modern usage increasingly leaves it invariable in all positions, and the spelling reform of 1990 blessed that. is now widely accepted alongside . Examiners tend to accept both; the perception verbs proper are the ones where the test still bites.

laisser versus permettre

Two verbs, one English word, and different plumbing.

VerbPerson isLinkerExample
directnone
indirect permets
  • . (I let him go.)
  • permets . (I allow him to leave.)
  • Je lui laisse partir and je le permets partir are both wrong.

belongs to the à quelqu' family covered on the infinitive or subjunctive page; does not. In register, is the ordinary word and often means "not stop" rather than "give permission": - is closer to "leave him to sleep" than to any granting of rights.

laisser faire and laisser tomber

Two set expressions, both built from plus an infinitive, and neither of them meaning what the parts say.

= to let it be, to not interfere.

  • , s'. (Leave it, it will sort itself out.)
  • As a noun, -, which English borrowed whole for the economic doctrine.

= to drop. Start with the literal sense and the figurative one follows.

  • a son . (He dropped his glass.) - literal.
  • a . (She gave up her studies.) - figurative, and much commoner.
  • m'a . (He let me down.)
  • . (Forget it. / Never mind.) - the everyday one, used constantly.

on its own is worth having ready-made. It is what a French speaker says when a conversation is not worth continuing, and it is far more idiomatic than any of the textbook alternatives.

Worked examples

  • . (I see him coming. / I can see what he is up to.) - literal and figurative both live in this phrase.
  • On . (You can hear the birds singing.) - noun after the infinitive, the natural order.
  • J' . (I saw Marie close the door.) - the infinitive has its own object, so the person comes first.
  • . (I heard them singing.) - they sing, so the participle agrees.
  • j' . (The song I heard sung.) - the song is sung, so no agreement.
  • - . (Let me in.) - positive imperative, pronoun after.
  • . (Forget it.)

Common mistakes English speakers make

The commonest error is inserting a linker that the construction refuses: je le vois de venir, laisse-moi à partir. These verbs take a bare infinitive and nothing else. The second is a present participle imported from English: "I hear her singing" is l' , not je l'entends chantant. The third is leaving a pronoun object in front of the infinitive where the English word order suggests it belongs: it is , never je vois le venir, and in a compound tense the pronoun goes in front of the auxiliary, . The fourth is agreement by reflex, tacking an s onto every participle with a plural in front of it; the test is whether that plural is the doer of the infinitive, so agrees but j' does not. The fifth is mixing and : with and a bare infinitive, with and . Finally, do not read literally when somebody says it to you; almost always means "forget it", not that anything has been dropped.

See also

Practise: test yourself

Pick the right one

0/10

Choose the French that puts the object in a position the construction allows, and that uses a bare infinitive with no linker.

  1. I see him coming.

  2. Let me go.

  3. You can hear the birds singing.

  4. I heard the children singing.

  5. I saw the boys leave.

  6. The film I saw shown.

  7. He let his glass fall.

  8. I let him go.

  9. I allow him to leave.

  10. Forget it.

Fill in the blank

0/10

Complete each sentence with the missing pronoun or participle. Before writing an ending on a participle, ask whether the word in front is doing the second verb or having it done to it.

  1. Je vois venir. (le train) (pronoun in front of the conjugated verb)

  2. Je entends chanter. (les enfants) (direct object pronoun)

  3. Je les ai chanter. (entendre) (they are the ones singing, so agreement)

  4. La chanson que j'ai chanter. (entendre) (it is sung, it does not sing, so no agreement)

  5. Elle les a partir. (voir) (they are the ones leaving)

  6. -moi entrer. (laisser, imperative) (pronoun after a positive imperative)

  7. Il a laissé son verre. (the fixed expression for dropping something)

  8. Je permets de partir. (à Marc) (permettre takes an indirect object)

  9. Je laisse partir. (Marc) (laisser takes a direct object)

  10. On sentir la fumée. (pouvoir, present) (a bare infinitive follows)

Translation drill

0/10

Translate into French. Every one of these takes a bare infinitive, and half of them need you to decide whether a participle agrees.

  1. I see him coming.

  2. You can hear the birds singing.

  3. Let me go.

  4. I heard them singing.

  5. I saw her leave.

  6. He dropped his glass.

  7. She gave up her studies.

  8. I let him go.

  9. We watched the children play.

  10. I can feel the cold coming.

French · Free printables

Practice worksheets and infographics

Practice worksheets with answer keys built in, plus infographic and listicle formats. Open any one to view, print or save.

Free for members

The printable worksheets, infographics and PDFs are free with an account. Start a free week and download as many as you like.

Start your free week

Frequently asked questions

Which French verbs take an infinitive with no preposition?
The perception verbs voir, regarder, entendre, écouter and sentir, plus laisser, and alongside them the causative faire. je le vois venir (I see him coming), je l'entends chanter (I hear her singing), laisse-moi partir (let me go). No à and no de, which puts them in the same bracket as the modal-ish verbs vouloir, pouvoir, devoir, aller and savoir. The list is short enough to learn whole, and worth learning whole, because guessing a preposition into one of these is a clear error rather than an awkward turn of phrase.
Where does the object go with a perception verb plus infinitive?
A noun object can go either side of the infinitive, and French usually prefers it after when the infinitive has no object of its own: on entend chanter les oiseaux is more natural than on entend les oiseaux chanter, though both are correct. A pronoun object has no choice at all: it goes in front of the conjugated verb. je les entends chanter, je le vois venir, never je vois le venir. In a compound tense the pronoun moves in front of the auxiliary: je les ai entendus chanter.
Does the participle agree in j'ai vu partir Marie?
Only when the preceding object is doing the infinitive's action. je les ai vus partir agrees, because they are the ones leaving: vus takes an s. But la pièce que j'ai vu jouer does not agree, because the play is not doing the playing, it is being played. The test is a question: is the thing in front the doer of the infinitive or the thing it is done to? Doer, agree; done to, do not. This is the one place these verbs part company with faire, whose participle never agrees at all.
What do laisser faire and laisser tomber mean?
laisser faire means to let it be, to not interfere: laisse faire, ça va s'arranger. It can be a noun too, le laisser-faire, in politics and economics, borrowed straight into English. laisser tomber means to drop, literally and then figuratively: il a laissé tomber son verre (he dropped his glass), but far more often il a laissé tomber ses études (he gave up his studies) or the bare laisse tomber, which is the everyday French for forget it, never mind. Neither is deducible from the parts, so learn them as vocabulary.
What is the difference between laisser and permettre?
Structure, mainly. laisser takes a direct object and a bare infinitive: je le laisse partir (I let him go), laissez-moi entrer (let me in). permettre takes an indirect object and de: je lui permets de partir. So the person is le with laisser and lui with permettre, which is a favourite exam trap. In register, laisser is the everyday word and permettre the formal one, and laisser also carries a shade of not preventing rather than actively allowing.