French Imperfect Subjunctive (Subjonctif Imparfait): Recognise It
By Michael McGettrickUpdated 25 October 2026
The imperfect subjunctive is the subjunctive of classic French after a past main verb: . - He had to leave. Modern French says . The form you will meet most is the third person singular, and its badge is a circumflex: , , , .
The whole tense on one screen: the passé simple it is built on, the imperfect subjunctive, and what modern French writes instead.
| Passé simple | Imp. subj. | Modern | English |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | that he was |
| | | that he had |
| | | that he did |
| | | that he came |
| | | that he could |
| | | that he knew |
| | | that he spoke |
Quick check
Now use it: three quick questions on the chart above. The full practice is further down.
Pick the right one
0/3Which modern form means the same?
qu'il fût
qu'il eût
qu'il fît (Fît comes from il fit, the passé simple of faire.)
It is on the AQA A-level grammar list as a recognition-only item, at full A-level and not at AS: you read it, you do not write it.
How it is built
Take the form of the and drop its final s. What is left is the stem: gives parla-, gives fu-, gives eu-, gives vin-. Then add the endings.
| Subject | parler | avoir | être |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Five of the six persons hiss with a double s. The third person singular is the odd one out: no ss, just a circumflex on the stem vowel and a t.
The rule works for every verb, irregulars included, because the irregularity is already in the :
| Infinitive | Passé simple | Imp. subj. | English |
|---|---|---|---|
| | that he did | |
| | that he came | |
| | that he had to | |
| | that he left |
For the result is a near twin of the present subjunctive. , and belong to both tenses; only , against , gives the imperfect away.
The circumflex: fut or fût?
In the third person singular, the never takes a circumflex and the imperfect subjunctive always does. That one accent is the whole difference on the page.
| Passé simple | Imp. subj. | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| | he was / that he was |
| | he had / that he had |
| | he did / that he did |
| | he came / that he came |
| | he spoke / that he spoke |
The context agrees with the accent. A subjunctive sits after a trigger such as , or :
.- He was ill all winter., .- Although he was ill, he went on working.
Watch the source, too. Careful editions print the accent, but a careless web copy of an old text may drop it, and then the trigger before the verb is your only guide.
Two warnings. The and forms of the carry a circumflex too ( ), so the rule is about and only. And a handful of ordinary presents carry one: , , are indicative presents, not subjunctives.
Where you meet it
The imperfect subjunctive belongs to the old rule of tense agreement, the concordance : a past main verb put the subjunctive clause into the imperfect.
| Trigger | Literary | English |
|---|---|---|
. | He had to leave. | |
. | I wanted her to come. | |
, . | Although it was late, she went out. | |
. | She was waiting for nightfall. |
The full classical scheme had four cells. Modern French keeps the top row's pair for both rows:
| Main verb | Same time or later | Earlier |
|---|---|---|
| (now) | | |
| (old) | | |
| (today) | | |
Read across: I doubt he is coming, I doubt he came; then the same doubt in the past. The middle row is the one this page is about, and the one a modern writer replaces with the last.
You meet it in classic literature (Balzac, Flaubert, Proust), in very formal prose, and in writers and journalists who use it for effect. Even there, it is usually the third person singular. The other persons sound so heavy that writers avoid them: is a form many French readers find faintly comic.
Modern French: the present subjunctive
Everyday modern French has dropped that rule. After a past main verb it uses the present subjunctive, which is what you should write.
| Trigger | Literary | Modern |
|---|---|---|
. | . | |
| | |
. | . |
The glosses: I wanted her to come. Although he was ill. We had to leave. The meaning does not change: the modern sentence is the same sentence in today's spelling of the grammar. For the present subjunctive itself, see its formation.
Set phrases that survive
A few fixed expressions keep the imperfect subjunctive in modern formal French. Most invert the verb, with no .
| Phrase | Example | English |
|---|---|---|
| - | , - . | Stay, if only for an hour. |
| - | , - , . | No man, even a king, is above the law. |
| - | , - . | He will finish, even if it takes him all night. |
, . | Whatever the truth, she never came back. |
is the past-tense partner of the everyday , whatever the case may be. Unlike the other three, it belongs to literary narrative only: a modern writer uses even in a past story.
The pluperfect subjunctive: qu'il eût fait
Put the auxiliary into the imperfect subjunctive and add a past participle, and you have the pluperfect subjunctive: , . It is the literary form of the past subjunctive, for an event already over before a past main verb.
| Trigger | Literary | Modern |
|---|---|---|
, . | , . | |
. | . | |
. | . |
The glosses: Although he had finished, he stayed. I was sorry she had left. He left before she had finished.
Do not confuse it with the passé antérieur, which has no circumflex: , when he had finished, is indicative.
Il eût été préférable: a conditional in disguise
In a main clause, the pluperfect subjunctive can stand in for the past conditional. Grammars call it the . Read it as would have.
| Verb | Literary | Modern |
|---|---|---|
. | . | |
. | . | |
? | ? |
The glosses: It would have been better to leave. We should have acted sooner. Who would have thought it?
is one you may still meet in a formal newspaper column. In literary past conditionals both halves can take this form: , . - If he had known, he would have come. Modern French writes , .
Reading a literary passage
Here is a in the classic style, with every literary verb coloured:
., .; , .
The young man had to leave before dawn. Although he was exhausted, he got up without a sound. His mother would have liked to keep him back; she said nothing, for fear he might see her cry.
Two questions unlock each verb. Is it a third person with a circumflex? Does it follow or come inverted? If so, swap in the modern form and read on.
| Literary | Tense | Modern |
|---|---|---|
| imperfect subjunctive | ||
| imperfect subjunctive | ||
| simple | ||
| pluperfect subj., would have | ||
| simple | a | |
| imperfect subjunctive |
The before negates nothing: it is the literary that attracts.
Mistakes English speakers make
| Form | Misread as | Really | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| he was | that he was | circumflex: subjunctive |
| he had been | it would have been | a conditional in disguise |
| a subjunctive | he knows | an ordinary present |
| that he had finished | he had finished | no circumflex: indicative |
| that he finishes | that he finished | the present is |
And the writing mistake: using it in your own essay. Write ; in an A-level answer reads as showing off, and a wrong circumflex costs more than it gains.
What to do next
- Learn the third-person forms by sight:
,,,,,,. - In any classic novel, read each one aloud as its modern present subjunctive.
- Go back to the passé simple if a stem does not ring a bell: every form here is built on it.