40 Latin Legal Terms, Explained by an Actual Latin Course
Every other page on this subject gives you a glossary. A glossary is the least useful way to learn legal Latin, because these are not words. They are fragments of Latin sentences that got detached from their sentences several hundred years ago, and the endings they are still wearing are the whole point. rea and reus differ by one letter because one noun is feminine and one is masculine. is in the ablative. Affidavit is a verb, and has never once been a noun in Latin.
Learn them grouped by grammar and forty terms collapse into about six patterns. Here are all forty, sorted by what they are actually doing.
1. Verbs that got jobs as nouns
The oldest trick in legal Latin: take the first or most memorable word of a writ, and let it name the document.
| Term | Literally | The grammar |
|---|---|---|
| habeas | you are to have the body | present subjunctive of plus a neuter accusative |
| subpoena | under penalty | plus the ablative of , two words fused into one |
| affidavit | he has sworn on oath | third person singular perfect of affido |
| caveat | let him beware | jussive subjunctive of caveo, an order aimed at a third party |
| mandamus | we order | first person plural present of mando |
| certiorari | to be informed more fully | present passive infinitive of certioro |
| nolle prosequi | to be unwilling to prosecute | infinitive of plus a deponent infinitive |
| fiat | let it be done | jussive subjunctive of , the same form as in fiat |
Caveat is the one worth stopping on, because it explains a construction most learners meet late. Latin has no imperative for let him do something: an imperative can only address the person in front of you. So it uses the subjunctive in a main clause, and that is a jussive subjunctive. Caveat emptor is let the buyer beware, with emptor in the nominative because he is the subject of the verb. English then took caveat, a third person singular verb, and made it a noun you can pluralise, so contracts now have caveats.
Habeas works the same way one person over: a second person subjunctive giving a formal instruction to the gaoler. Certiorari is a passive infinitive and means to be more fully informed, which is exactly what a superior court is asking for when it calls up the record of a lower one. Mandamus is a plain first person plural: we command, in the royal voice, which is why it survives in jurisdictions that kept the prerogative writs.
2. Prepositions taking the ablative
Ten terms, one rule. , ex, pro, and in (when it means position rather than motion) all put their noun in the ablative.
| Term | Literally | The noun |
|---|---|---|
| facto | from the fact | ablative of |
| (de jure) | from the law | ablative of |
| pro | for the good | ablative; short for pro |
| ex | from one side | ablative of |
| in camera | in the chamber | ablative of camera, a room, not a device |
| in absentia | in absence | ablative of absentia |
| in | in the place of a parent | ablative , genitive |
| in flagrante delicto | while the offence is blazing | ablative plus a present participle agreeing |
| judice | under a judge | ablative of |
| pro rata | according to the calculated part | ablative of rata , the part reckoned |
Pro is the one people truncate without noticing. The full phrase is pro , for the public good, and is a neuter adjective standing in for the noun. Nobody says the third word any more, which is fine, but it means the phrase's grammar looks headless.
In camera is a favourite of headline writers who imagine a photographer. Camera is simply a vaulted room, later a judge's private chamber, and the phrase means the hearing was held in the judge's room rather than in open court. The optical instrument got its name from the same word by way of the camera obscura, the dark room.
In flagrante delicto deserves better than the use it gets. It is an ablative absolute in miniature: while the crime is burning, that is, mid-offence. It applies perfectly well to a burglary. Popular usage has confined it to one specific sort of crime scene, which says more about popular usage than about the Latin.
3. Prepositions taking the accusative
The other half of the rule. Ad, , per, and all take the accusative.
| Term | Literally | The noun |
|---|---|---|
| ad litem | for the lawsuit | accusative of , a dispute |
| ad | for this | neuter accusative of |
| among other things | neuter accusative plural of | |
| per | by itself | accusative of the reflexive pronoun |
| beyond the powers | accusative plural of | |
| turned towards, against | a perfect participle of , used as a preposition |
is neuter plural: among other things. If you mean among other people, the correct form is , and if all of them are women, . Barristers get this right and journalists do not.
Ad litem and ad are the same construction with different nouns, so a guardian appointed ad litem is appointed for the purposes of this suit only, and dissolves when the suit does. is an act beyond the powers an authority actually has, and its opposite, , is almost never said aloud, because nobody litigates about things that were allowed.
And it is per , never per say. is a pronoun. There is no verb in it.
4. Bare ablatives, no preposition attached
Latin can put a noun in the ablative and let the case do the work of a preposition. Five of these are everywhere.
| Term | Literally | The grammar |
|---|---|---|
| at first appearance | ablative of with an adjective agreeing | |
| facto | by the fact itself | ablative of means, agreeing with |
| in good faith | ablative of | |
| mutatis mutandis | with the things to be changed having been changed | ablative absolute: participle plus gerundive |
| ex post facto | from a fact afterwards | ex plus ablative, with post used adverbially |
Mutatis mutandis is the most impressive thing in the whole of legal Latin and gets used as though it meant and so on. It is an ablative absolute built from two forms of the same verb: mutatis, a perfect passive participle, having been changed, and mutandis, a gerundive, the things that need changing. The clause means: once you have changed everything that needs changing, the rest applies. That is a genuinely precise instruction, and it fits in two words.
is an ablative meaning in good faith, and English reanalysed it as an adjective, so we now write a bona fide offer, which in Latin is not a possible phrase. The nominative then arrived separately and got treated as an English plural: his bona fides are impeccable. That is a Latin feminine singular taking a plural verb. There is more of this in Latin phrases used in English.
5. A noun and an adjective, agreeing
Four terms, one rule: the adjective matches its noun in case, number and gender. Change the noun and you must change the adjective.
| Term | Literally | Why the ending is what it is |
|---|---|---|
| rea | a guilty mind | is feminine, so reus becomes rea |
| reus | a guilty act | is masculine, so the adjective stays reus |
| judicata | a thing adjudged | is feminine; judicata is a perfect participle |
| obiter | a thing said in passing | is a neuter participle used as a noun; obiter is an adverb |
This pair is the best advertisement for Latin adjective agreement in existence. rea and reus are the same adjective twice. Nothing about guilt changes between them; only the gender of the noun does. Once you see that, the -a and -us stop looking like arbitrary legal decoration.
The plural of obiter is obiter dicta, and of judicata, judicatae. Judges say dicta constantly and half the profession thinks it is a singular.
6. Genitives hanging off a noun
A genitive means of, and Latin usually puts it after the noun it depends on.
| Term | Literally | The genitive |
|---|---|---|
| friend of the court | , genitive of | |
| probandi | the burden of proving | probandi, a gerund in the genitive |
| decidendi | the reason for deciding | decidendi, a gerund in the genitive |
| standi | a place of standing | standi, a gerund in the genitive |
| delicti | the body of the offence | delicti, genitive of delictum |
Three of these five use a gerund, the verbal noun that gives English -ing: proving, deciding, standing. Latin declines it like a noun, so probandi is of proving. That is one construction covering the burden of proof, the binding part of a judgment, and the right to bring a case at all. If gerunds are on your list of things to avoid, legal Latin has bad news, and gerunds and gerundives has the fix.
delicti is not a corpse. It is the body of the offence, meaning the substance of the crime: the fact that a crime happened at all. Crime fiction has ruined this one so thoroughly that the misunderstanding is now more common than the term.
7. Two whole sentences
| Term | Literally | The grammar |
|---|---|---|
| the thing itself speaks | nominative subject plus a deponent verb | |
| meruit | as much as he has earned | a relative adverb plus a perfect verb |
is a complete Latin sentence with a subject and a verb, and it is the only one most people meet that uses a deponent: looks passive and is active. The doctrine says the accident could not have happened without negligence, so the facts argue the case by themselves. meruit means a claim for the value of work actually done, in the absence of an agreed price.
Three more full sentences worth knowing, without the table: stare decisis, to stand by things decided, an infinitive plus an ablative; , nobody gives what he does not have; and volenti fit , no wrong is done to one who consents, where volenti is a dative present participle.
The misuses worth correcting
- does not mean obvious. It means sufficient on first inspection, pending rebuttal. The whole point is that it can be rebutted.
- facto and jure are opposites and get swapped constantly.
factois what is happening;jureis what the law says. - is neuter. People are
. - Obiter dicta and judicatae are plurals. Using dicta as a singular is now so common it is nearly standard, which does not make it right.
- Ad means for this specific purpose, which is a sign of planning. English has drifted it to mean improvised, the opposite.
- Per , not per say.
- In camera involves a room.
What to take away
- Legal Latin is frozen sentences, not vocabulary. The ending is the meaning, so read the endings first, exactly as in the Latin case system.
- Prepositions fix the case:
,ex,pro,and stationaryintake the ablative;ad,,per,take the accusative. Affidavit,mandamus,caveat,fiatandhabeasare conjugated verbs. English made nouns of them.reaandreusare one adjective agreeing with two nouns of different gender. That is the entire difference.- Genitives hang off the back, and three of the big ones are gerunds:
probandi,decidendi,standi. - Say it the way your jurisdiction says it, and know what it would have sounded like in Rome.
If you want the rest of the machinery rather than forty samples of it, the Latin course builds the cases, the subjunctive and the participles in order from nothing. And if you are here because you like the sound of the phrases, the honest companion piece is Latin tattoo phrases that are actually grammatical, where the stakes of getting an ending wrong are permanent rather than merely embarrassing.