Kilo Lingo
Part of Chapter 12

10 min read

Test yourself (17 questions)

40 Latin Legal Terms, Explained by an Actual Latin Course

Every other page on this subject gives you a glossary. A glossary is the least useful way to learn legal Latin, because these are not words. They are fragments of Latin sentences that got detached from their sentences several hundred years ago, and the endings they are still wearing are the whole point. rea and reus differ by one letter because one noun is feminine and one is masculine. is in the ablative. Affidavit is a verb, and has never once been a noun in Latin.

Learn them grouped by grammar and forty terms collapse into about six patterns. Here are all forty, sorted by what they are actually doing.

1. Verbs that got jobs as nouns

The oldest trick in legal Latin: take the first or most memorable word of a writ, and let it name the document.

TermLiterallyThe grammar
habeas you are to have the bodypresent subjunctive of plus a neuter accusative
subpoenaunder penalty plus the ablative of , two words fused into one
affidavithe has sworn on oaththird person singular perfect of affido
caveatlet him bewarejussive subjunctive of caveo, an order aimed at a third party
mandamuswe orderfirst person plural present of mando
certiorarito be informed more fullypresent passive infinitive of certioro
nolle prosequito be unwilling to prosecuteinfinitive of plus a deponent infinitive
fiatlet it be donejussive subjunctive of , the same form as in fiat

Caveat is the one worth stopping on, because it explains a construction most learners meet late. Latin has no imperative for let him do something: an imperative can only address the person in front of you. So it uses the subjunctive in a main clause, and that is a jussive subjunctive. Caveat emptor is let the buyer beware, with emptor in the nominative because he is the subject of the verb. English then took caveat, a third person singular verb, and made it a noun you can pluralise, so contracts now have caveats.

Habeas works the same way one person over: a second person subjunctive giving a formal instruction to the gaoler. Certiorari is a passive infinitive and means to be more fully informed, which is exactly what a superior court is asking for when it calls up the record of a lower one. Mandamus is a plain first person plural: we command, in the royal voice, which is why it survives in jurisdictions that kept the prerogative writs.

2. Prepositions taking the ablative

Ten terms, one rule. , ex, pro, and in (when it means position rather than motion) all put their noun in the ablative.

TermLiterallyThe noun
factofrom the factablative of
(de jure)from the lawablative of
pro for the goodablative; short for pro
ex from one sideablative of
in camerain the chamberablative of camera, a room, not a device
in absentiain absenceablative of absentia
in in the place of a parentablative , genitive
in flagrante delictowhile the offence is blazingablative plus a present participle agreeing
judiceunder a judgeablative of
pro rataaccording to the calculated partablative of rata , the part reckoned

Pro is the one people truncate without noticing. The full phrase is pro , for the public good, and is a neuter adjective standing in for the noun. Nobody says the third word any more, which is fine, but it means the phrase's grammar looks headless.

In camera is a favourite of headline writers who imagine a photographer. Camera is simply a vaulted room, later a judge's private chamber, and the phrase means the hearing was held in the judge's room rather than in open court. The optical instrument got its name from the same word by way of the camera obscura, the dark room.

In flagrante delicto deserves better than the use it gets. It is an ablative absolute in miniature: while the crime is burning, that is, mid-offence. It applies perfectly well to a burglary. Popular usage has confined it to one specific sort of crime scene, which says more about popular usage than about the Latin.

3. Prepositions taking the accusative

The other half of the rule. Ad, , per, and all take the accusative.

TermLiterallyThe noun
ad litemfor the lawsuitaccusative of , a dispute
ad for thisneuter accusative of
among other thingsneuter accusative plural of
per by itselfaccusative of the reflexive pronoun
beyond the powersaccusative plural of
turned towards, againsta perfect participle of , used as a preposition

is neuter plural: among other things. If you mean among other people, the correct form is , and if all of them are women, . Barristers get this right and journalists do not.

Ad litem and ad are the same construction with different nouns, so a guardian appointed ad litem is appointed for the purposes of this suit only, and dissolves when the suit does. is an act beyond the powers an authority actually has, and its opposite, , is almost never said aloud, because nobody litigates about things that were allowed.

And it is per , never per say. is a pronoun. There is no verb in it.

4. Bare ablatives, no preposition attached

Latin can put a noun in the ablative and let the case do the work of a preposition. Five of these are everywhere.

TermLiterallyThe grammar
at first appearanceablative of with an adjective agreeing
factoby the fact itselfablative of means, agreeing with
in good faithablative of
mutatis mutandiswith the things to be changed having been changedablative absolute: participle plus gerundive
ex post factofrom a fact afterwardsex plus ablative, with post used adverbially

Mutatis mutandis is the most impressive thing in the whole of legal Latin and gets used as though it meant and so on. It is an ablative absolute built from two forms of the same verb: mutatis, a perfect passive participle, having been changed, and mutandis, a gerundive, the things that need changing. The clause means: once you have changed everything that needs changing, the rest applies. That is a genuinely precise instruction, and it fits in two words.

is an ablative meaning in good faith, and English reanalysed it as an adjective, so we now write a bona fide offer, which in Latin is not a possible phrase. The nominative then arrived separately and got treated as an English plural: his bona fides are impeccable. That is a Latin feminine singular taking a plural verb. There is more of this in Latin phrases used in English.

5. A noun and an adjective, agreeing

Four terms, one rule: the adjective matches its noun in case, number and gender. Change the noun and you must change the adjective.

TermLiterallyWhy the ending is what it is
reaa guilty mind is feminine, so reus becomes rea
reusa guilty act is masculine, so the adjective stays reus
judicataa thing adjudged is feminine; judicata is a perfect participle
obiter a thing said in passing is a neuter participle used as a noun; obiter is an adverb

This pair is the best advertisement for Latin adjective agreement in existence. rea and reus are the same adjective twice. Nothing about guilt changes between them; only the gender of the noun does. Once you see that, the -a and -us stop looking like arbitrary legal decoration.

The plural of obiter is obiter dicta, and of judicata, judicatae. Judges say dicta constantly and half the profession thinks it is a singular.

6. Genitives hanging off a noun

A genitive means of, and Latin usually puts it after the noun it depends on.

TermLiterallyThe genitive
friend of the court, genitive of
probandithe burden of provingprobandi, a gerund in the genitive
decidendithe reason for decidingdecidendi, a gerund in the genitive
standia place of standingstandi, a gerund in the genitive
delictithe body of the offencedelicti, genitive of delictum

Three of these five use a gerund, the verbal noun that gives English -ing: proving, deciding, standing. Latin declines it like a noun, so probandi is of proving. That is one construction covering the burden of proof, the binding part of a judgment, and the right to bring a case at all. If gerunds are on your list of things to avoid, legal Latin has bad news, and gerunds and gerundives has the fix.

delicti is not a corpse. It is the body of the offence, meaning the substance of the crime: the fact that a crime happened at all. Crime fiction has ruined this one so thoroughly that the misunderstanding is now more common than the term.

7. Two whole sentences

TermLiterallyThe grammar
the thing itself speaksnominative subject plus a deponent verb
meruitas much as he has earneda relative adverb plus a perfect verb

is a complete Latin sentence with a subject and a verb, and it is the only one most people meet that uses a deponent: looks passive and is active. The doctrine says the accident could not have happened without negligence, so the facts argue the case by themselves. meruit means a claim for the value of work actually done, in the absence of an agreed price.

Three more full sentences worth knowing, without the table: stare decisis, to stand by things decided, an infinitive plus an ablative; , nobody gives what he does not have; and volenti fit , no wrong is done to one who consents, where volenti is a dative present participle.

The misuses worth correcting

  • does not mean obvious. It means sufficient on first inspection, pending rebuttal. The whole point is that it can be rebutted.
  • facto and jure are opposites and get swapped constantly. facto is what is happening; jure is what the law says.
  • is neuter. People are .
  • Obiter dicta and judicatae are plurals. Using dicta as a singular is now so common it is nearly standard, which does not make it right.
  • Ad means for this specific purpose, which is a sign of planning. English has drifted it to mean improvised, the opposite.
  • Per , not per say.
  • In camera involves a room.

What to take away

  • Legal Latin is frozen sentences, not vocabulary. The ending is the meaning, so read the endings first, exactly as in the Latin case system.
  • Prepositions fix the case: , ex, pro, and stationary in take the ablative; ad, , per, take the accusative.
  • Affidavit, mandamus, caveat, fiat and habeas are conjugated verbs. English made nouns of them.
  • rea and reus are one adjective agreeing with two nouns of different gender. That is the entire difference.
  • Genitives hang off the back, and three of the big ones are gerunds: probandi, decidendi, standi.
  • Say it the way your jurisdiction says it, and know what it would have sounded like in Rome.

If you want the rest of the machinery rather than forty samples of it, the Latin course builds the cases, the subjunctive and the participles in order from nothing. And if you are here because you like the sound of the phrases, the honest companion piece is Latin tattoo phrases that are actually grammatical, where the stakes of getting an ending wrong are permanent rather than merely embarrassing.

Practise: test yourself

Pick the right one

0/6

What kind of Latin is each term?

  1. de facto

  2. mandamus

  3. actus reus

  4. onus probandi

  5. in camera

  6. res judicata

Pick the right one

0/5

De facto or de jure?

  1. They never married, but they have lived as a couple for twenty years.

  2. Parliament passed the Act, so the power now exists in law.

  3. Nobody appointed her, but she has run the department for a decade.

  4. The treaty formally confers the right of passage.

  5. English is not the official language of the United States, only the usual one.

Fill in the blank

0/6

Name the term from its literal meaning.

  1. Literally 'you are to have the body', the writ against unlawful detention: (Two words. The verb is a present subjunctive.)

  2. Literally 'a guilty mind', the mental element of a crime: (A feminine noun with a feminine adjective agreeing.)

  3. Literally 'at first appearance', a bare ablative with no preposition: (The noun is fifth declension.)

  4. Literally 'friend of the court': (The second word is a genitive.)

  5. Literally 'beyond the powers', of an act outside an authority's remit: (Ultra takes the accusative plural.)

  6. Literally 'a thing adjudged', which cannot be litigated again: (Res plus a perfect passive participle agreeing with it.)

Latin · Free printables

Practice worksheets and infographics

Practice worksheets with answer keys built in, plus infographic and listicle formats. Open any one to view, print or save.

Free for members

The printable worksheets, infographics and PDFs are free with an account. Start a free week and download as many as you like.

Start your free week

Frequently asked questions

What does habeas corpus literally mean?
It means 'you are to have the body', or more loosely 'may you have the body'. Habeas is the present subjunctive, second person singular, of habeo, and corpus is a neuter accusative, the direct object. The words are the opening of a writ addressed to whoever is holding a prisoner, ordering that person to produce the detainee physically before a court so the detention can be justified. English took the first two words of the document and used them as the name of the whole thing, which is how most legal Latin got its name. The body in question is a living one, which people forget.
What is the difference between mens rea and actus reus?
Actus reus is the guilty act, the physical thing done; mens rea is the guilty mind, the mental state that went with it. Grammatically they are the same construction twice: a noun plus an adjective agreeing with it in case, number and gender. Actus is masculine, so its adjective is reus; mens is feminine, so it takes rea. The maxim behind the pair is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, the act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is also guilty, and the two halves of that sentence are why both terms exist at all. Most crimes require both, which is why intent arguments take up so much court time.
What does prima facie mean?
Literally 'at first appearance'. Both words are ablative: prima is a feminine adjective agreeing with facie, the ablative of facies, a fifth-declension noun meaning face or appearance. There is no preposition, because Latin can use a bare ablative to mean at, by or on a given occasion. A prima facie case is one that stands up on first inspection, sufficient to go forward unless it is rebutted, which is not at all the same as obvious or proven. Using it to mean 'clearly' is the commonest lay misuse of any legal Latin term.
Is legal Latin pronounced like classical Latin?
Almost never, and that is a settled convention rather than an error. English courts inherited a pronunciation from medieval and early modern lawyers, so sub judice is 'sub JOO-di-see', not the classical 'sub YOO-di-keh', and certiorari comes out as something like 'sir-shee-uh-RAIR-eye'. Mens rea is normally 'menz RAY-uh' in England, and amicus curiae is 'a-MEE-kus KYOO-ree-eye' or 'am-i-kus KYOO-ree-ee' depending on who trained you. The classical pronunciation is the historically accurate one and is what this course teaches, but reading a writ aloud in reconstructed classical Latin in an English courtroom would be a choice. Say what the room says.