The Esperanto Accusative: What -n Does, and Its Four Jobs
By Michael McGettrickUpdated 11 October 2026
Add -n to the direct object of the verb, the thing the verb lands on. The subject never takes it.
| Esperanto | English |
|---|---|
. | I see the person. |
. | The person sees me. |
. | She wants that. |
Quick check
Now use it: three quick questions on the chart above. The full practice is further down.
Fill in the blank
0/3Add -n where the sentence needs it. Write the full word, or just the missing ending where the blank follows a stem.
Mi vidas la . (homo) (The person is what is being seen.)
Accents optional - cx, gx, ux work for ĉ, ĝ, ŭ
Ŝi havas bela vizaĝon. (bela) (The adjective agrees with the object.)
Accents optional - cx, gx, ux work for ĉ, ĝ, ŭ
Li amas . (mi) (Pronouns take -n too.)
Accents optional - cx, gx, ux work for ĉ, ĝ, ŭ
gains -n when it is the one being seen and loses it when it does the seeing:
Mi donas la libron al vi: the book is what the verb lands on, so it takes -n; the person receiving it gets al, never -n.
You already do this, on a handful of words
English marks the object too, but only on pronouns:
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| I | me |
| he | him |
| she | her |
| we | us |
| they | them |
Nobody says him saw I. That instinct is the accusative. What English lost is the marking on nouns: the cat is the cat whether it sees or is seen, so English fixes the word order instead. Esperanto kept the ending, on every noun, adjective and pronoun:
.- I see him. (English marks it too).- I see the man. (English does not)
What it buys you: word order stops mattering
In English, position is the only thing telling these apart: the dog bit the man, the man bit the dog. In Esperanto the ending carries it, so all three of these mean the dog bit the man:
.- The dog bit the man..- The dog bit the man. (stress on the man)
has the -n, so the man got bitten wherever he sits in the line. In everyday speech the plain order, subject then verb then object, is still the usual one; the freedom is for emphasis.
Adjectives and plurals agree
Everything describing the object is marked too. The plural -j comes first, then -n:
| Subject | Object | |
|---|---|---|
| one | | |
| several | | |
.- I see the good people.
It is one decision made on each word, and it means an adjective can sit half a sentence from its noun and stay unambiguous.
The four jobs of -n
The object is the first job and by far the commonest. The same ending does three more:
| Job | Example | English |
|---|---|---|
| object | . | I see the house. |
| movement | . | I go into the house. |
| measure | . | He stayed three days. |
| time | . | I will come on Monday. |
Job two: movement towards
After a preposition of place, -n turns position into direction:
| Position (no -n) | English | Direction (-n) | English |
|---|---|---|---|
| in the house | | into the house |
| on the table | | onto the table |
| under the table | | to under the table |
- .
- .
Same man, same en: walking into the house takes -n, being in it does not.
.- I put it onto the table..- The cat is under the table.
English has in/into and on/onto, then runs out. Esperanto handles every place preposition the same way. Prepositions that already mean direction, such as , and , never take -n:
.- I am going to the house..- She came out of the house..- We went as far as the road.
Job three: measurement and extent
-n also marks how much: a price, a distance, a duration, a weight, an age. Nothing is being acted on; it is a measure, and Esperanto marks it the same way:
.- It is two metres tall..- It costs ten euros..- I waited one hour.
The object test, what is being verbed?, comes back empty here. The working question is different: if the phrase answers how much, how far, how long or how old, it takes -n.
Job four: time and date
Esperanto can mark a point in time with a preposition: for a clock time, for a stretch. Drop the preposition and -n does the same work:
.- I will come on Monday..- We will come next week..- She will come on 5 May.
and mean the same; the -n form is the crisp, everyday one for days and dates. The whole phrase agrees as an object would, with -n on the words that carry the date and none on , which sits behind . (More in time expressions.)
Where -n never goes
| Where | Example | English |
|---|---|---|
| the subject | . | The person sees me. |
after | . | The person is good. |
after | . | He became a teacher. |
| place, no movement | . | I am in the house. |
| other prepositions | . | I am talking with the person. |
and link two descriptions of the same thing, so there is no object for -n to mark.
Mistakes English speakers make
| Wrong | Right | Why |
|---|---|---|
. | . | the object takes -n |
| | every word of the object agrees |
. | . | the subject never takes -n |
| | nothing after is an object |
| | no movement, no -n |
The usual slip is forgetting -n on the second noun of a longer sentence. The cure is mechanical: ask what is being verbed? Whatever answers takes -n, and so does every word describing it.
What to do next
- Write three sentences with
and a different object each. - Say each one again with the object first:
. - Then read tricky prepositions for the direction
-nin depth.
See also
- Tricky prepositions - the direction
-nseen from the preposition's side. - Time expressions - dates and days with the time
-n:,. - Word order and style - what you can do with the freedom the
-nbuys you. - Personal pronouns -
,,: the-non every pronoun.