Ch 11 · Lesson 17

In principio erat Verbum: John 1:1-5

, not : the imperfect against Genesis's perfect. Then where the Vulgate parts company with Cicero, and why Jerome would not smooth it.

The short version

John's is not Genesis's creavit

.

In the beginning was the Word.
Why?

Genesis and John open with the same words, in , and differ in one verb. Creavit is perfect: one act, done. is imperfect: a state with no beginning marked. Had John written , the Word's existence would read as a finished episode.

John 1:1-5: erat, not fuit

perfect: one actimperfect: a statepresentWhat do the colours mean?

In , , . in . : , . In , : in lucet, comprehenderunt.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was made nothing that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men: and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not grasp it. (John 1:1-5)

John opens with Genesis's first words and swaps one verb. Genesis has the perfect, one completed act; John has the imperfect, a state with no beginning marked:

  • erat Verbum: the Word was (imperfect, a state)

  • creavit, facta sunt: created, were made (perfect, one act)

  • lucet: the light shines (present)

Timeline from past to now, with now marked.

TenseLatinEnglish
perfect creavit In the beginning God created
imperfect In the beginning was the Word
present lucetthe light shines in the darkness

Had John written , the perfect of , the Word's existence would read as a finished episode. Things get made at a point ( , perfect passive) while the Word simply . Then 5 jumps to the present: in a passage set in the past, the light shines now.

Three things to catch:

  • has two nominatives. The Greek, which marks the subject with the article, makes the subject: and the Word was God.
  • is the relative pronoun, which, not the that of Genesis 1:4. Only the clause tells you which.
  • Comprehenderunt means both grasped (understood) and seized. The King James has comprehended it not; modern versions have did not overcome it. The Greek allows both.

Where the Vulgate parts company with Cicero

FeatureClassicalVulgate
indirect statementaccusative and infinitive or plus a verb
sentence openersa connecting relative, endlessly
clausesnested inside each otherside by side
word orderverb tends to the endverb often first
vocabularyliteraryordinary, plus Greek loans

Renaissance humanists, measuring by Cicero, called it barbarous. Jerome worried about it himself: in his letter to Eustochium (Letter 22) he dreams he is accused before a judge, Ciceronianus , , you are a Ciceronian, not a Christian. His defence, in his letter on translation (Letter 57), is that in scripture even the order of the words is a mystery, so he would not smooth it.

That is why the text suits a learner: the Latin was left transparent to the languages underneath it. The humanists won the argument about style and lost the argument about readers.

Mistakes English speakers make

WrongRightWhy
: is madewas madeperfect passive uses
the participle agrees with
: the objectthe subject has no object
dixitque: no entry + -chop off the -
= a state, not one actimperfect, not perfect

Going further: Why the Vulgate is easy and the rest of the guide, when you want them. This lesson does not need them.

Read the full guide (optional) · 8 min read

Practice

Practise this lesson

10-question session

One question at a time, mixed across the exercises in this lesson. Miss one and it comes back round before the end.

Latin · Free printables

Worksheets for this lesson

Worksheets with answer keys built in. Open any one to view, print or save.

Free for members

The printable worksheets, infographics and PDFs are free with an account. Start a free week and download as many as you like.

Start your free week

Lesson 17 of 19 in this chapter

Back to the curriculum

What do the colours mean?